Some photos of my AMT Star Trek U.S.S. Enterprise Command Bridge.
The original kit first appeared in 1975. (kit no. S950), and over time there has been a few re-issues with different box art, and improved decals.
My build is the second reissue, which was released in 1991 (version 6007) which is similar to first release, in that it does have updated decals, and, in my opinion more appealing box artwork.
I got the kit at this year’s Cromford event, and included were some duplicated parts, which allowed me to add a couple of additional figures and chairs, plus some extra walls, which I figured might be useful when I came to take some photos of the finished model.
The kit diorama shows all of the starboard wall of the bridge, a view not generally seen as, although wall sections could be removed to allow filming from different angles, a good number of shots from the TV series show the two rear starboard control stations, the turbo lift, and two or more of the port side control stations.
This, I’m told gave a more effective look toward the helm and Captain’s chair, and allowed for a more dramatic effect for personnel entering the set from the turbo lift.
The finished model is very nicely detailed, although for the nit-pickers, it does have one or two inaccuracies, particularly the turbo lift area, which should be a little wider.
Although the model has plenty of detail I felt the model needed a little extra, so I decided to scratch-build the overhead bridge lights, using card and coloured acetate, to give a more pleasing effect to my photos.
Ahead Warp Factor 2, Mr Sulu!
That looks superb!
ReplyDeleteThanks Kev. It's a fairly simple build, but somewhat repetitive, especially when it comes to applying the decals.
DeleteGorgeous, beautiful work. This one is a real Wow. SFZ
ReplyDeleteThanks Zigg. To be honest, I reckon the added lighting certainly helps to bring the model to life.
DeleteMagnificent. You've made this old Trekkie very happy.
ReplyDeleteCheers Baron, glad to hear you're a fellow Trekkie!
DeleteLovely work! I'm sorry that when Paramount decided to revisit the original Enterprise in Discovery and Strange New Worlds, they went into an alternate design universe that is obviously not an authentic prequel to the Original Series.
ReplyDeleteThanks Lewis. I did try to watch Discovery when it first aired, but It just didn't hold my interest, and unfortunately, not subscribing to Paramount plus I've yet to see an episode of Strange New Worlds. :(
DeleteWe could almost be looking into a real room there Scoop! Extraordinary modelling and photography. Its always a treat to see.
ReplyDeleteThanks Woodsy.
DeleteGreat depth of field, good choice of lens and '60s full spectrum Discotheque lighting.
ReplyDeleteWhat's not to like ?!
Cheers Mish, yes, I decided on a 10 second exposure on the camera's maximum f stop, and a low ISO to try and get a decent depth of field.
DeleteI can still remember first watching Star Trek on our first colour TV in the early seventies and thinking there's more colours in this than in real life! ;D
I was at a Q&A with a Paramount representative leading up to the release of the first Trek movie. He explained that they "had" to go to all those shades of white and off-white and buff instead of our colorful TV show's look because it was "the big screen," and you couldn't have all those bright colors on a big screen. He was so condescending. And so wrong.
DeleteThat's interesting, Baron, I suppose they were going for a clinical look, do you think?
DeleteThey looked at Star Wars and decided they should try something different, and went for a Kubrick 2001 vibe. Thought they'd attract the serious SF fans. Major fail.
DeleteYou may well be right, Baron, although I've personally got very little interest in Star Wars so in some ways I'm happy that the (slow) Motion Picture didn't follow the Star Wars look .
DeleteIf you mean Star Trek : The Motion Picture Baron, then I totally agree.
ReplyDeleteIt looked like it was shot in a sterilised futuristic hospital !
Do you mind sharing the paint color you used for the bridge?
ReplyDeleteCheck out this post, Anon. I listed what I used here. https://projectswordtoys.blogspot.com/2024/08/amt-enterprise-bridge-revisited.html
Delete