Hey Moonbasers!
How are you faring with the Brave New World of AI?
I hate generative art with a passion, because the systems have been trained with everything on the web, including artworks -regardless of copyright.
I searched "Have you been Scraped?" and sure enough, some of my work is already included.
I've decided I will not use Generative AI imagery in my puppet film, but it is almost impossible to use any system, without some form of AI lurking in the workings,
So I'm making background models and I looked at the new systems that create a 3 Dimensional model from a single photo.
I wanted BG models of the Houses of Parliament and King Charles' Gate - could the new systems come up with a basic shape I could work on in the real world?
It turns out the answer is yes. But as with all things AI, the spectre of "Hallucinations" are ever present.
I bet you never knew that Parliament had two Big Bens, or that they had rows of trumpeting angels on the roof!
Here are some screen grabs of the 3D meshes I'm working with, Good enough for background work, but still not a reliable substitute for reality!
Looey
Oz Base
it’s virtually impossible to avoid AI these days, as it’s wormed its insidious way into every system. I hate the idea of it, but have to admit to using it in my photography sometimes, in Lightroom and Photoshop, for a quick fix with a dodgy shot. It can be incredibly useful for removing stray dust and artefacts in photographs, but I draw the line at asking it to do the actual art side of it for me! Bill
ReplyDeleteIt has it's uses. In computing it is very helpful but in art I think it's pure plagarism. You can usually tell AI from a real artists talent. What does really annoy me is when people post fake AI clips they have made based on a single photograph that the AI has converted into the people in the photo moving around and interacting. Done without tne permission of the people or artists involved.
ReplyDelete