Thursday 7 September 2023

A Little Husky: Paul's Studebaker Wagonaire T.V. Car

Here are a couple of items I picked up at the winter Auckland model fair. First up is the Husky model of a Studebaker Wagonaire T.V. Car, with a rotating camera and cameraman in the rear.

Husky was a line of small, Matchbox-sized die-cast models made by Corgi, exclusively for sale in Woolworths shops. The line first appeared in 1964, and once the exclusive deal with Woolworths ended, Huskys became Corgi Juniors from 1970 onwards.

The Wagonaire TV Car first appeared in 1967, as number 15 in the Husky line. It later became a Corgi Junior. There was also an ambulance version, which was number 30.

The T.V. Car came in various shades of yellow, blue, metallic turquoise, and metallic lime green. The windows in the rear part of the body are tinted. The original plastic wheels were later replaced with low-friction Whizz Wheels, to compete with Hot Wheels, and Matchbox Superfast.


In the world of model railways, backscenes are used to add depth to a layout. Printed backscenes can be either paintings or photographs.

This one is by the German firm Busch, and it comes in two sections. It is double sided, with the same scene on each side, but one is daytime, and the other is night.

The box says Day & Night Hinterland. The scales given are HO/N/TT, so it is suitable for 1/87th, 1/160th, and 1/120th, but it will work with just about any scale.


The length is given as 198 cm, which is for both sheets combined, and the height is 34 cm. The copyright date is 2004, but I do not know if they are still available, since I bought mine at a fair.


Four different styles are shown on the side of the box: rural with fields, forests, and a river; or urban town/city scenes.

As I was photographing the models I got at the latest fair, I decided to try out the sheets. Having been rolled up for an unknown number of years, they wanted to roll back up again.

It may be necessary to glue them to a rigid backing sheet, but that would prevent them being switched from day to night. I did have problems with reflections on the night side, but the day shots seemed to come out well.

Hope you like them.

Paul Adams from New Zealand

9 comments:

  1. Busch scenics and Backgrounds are excellent for model photography , I have used their products over many years....new items are out there each year....always a good viewing of their promotional material around "Toy Fairs" to see whats new.....only problem in the UK....some of the items are in short supply....or not at all...but good quality . Richard Dixon TPD STUDIOS UK .

    ReplyDelete
  2. Reminds me of toodling around Hollywood shooting 'B-roll' for a low-budget movie. Cameraman with a pretty big camera in the passenger seat.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Put it near a dust devil and call it a storm chaser

    ReplyDelete
  4. Wow, what a beautiful diecast car! I would have died and gone to heaven having that one as a kid. I vaguely recall the Husky brand, but did not know they were an offshoot of Corgi. I had many Busch products during my heyday as a model railroader - a great brand! SFZ

    ReplyDelete
  5. The Busch backgrounds work so well. I'm amazed. You've set it all up beautifully Paul and I learnt new stuff too!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Oooh! Huskeys! I may still have a conveyer belt crane based on a VW Combi flatbed!
    I suspect the rubber band belt may not have survived the intervening half century!

    ReplyDelete
  7. That wouldn't be reporter Ned Cook and his cameraman Joe's other car, would it ?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Paul Adams from New Zealand9/08/2023 3:22 am

    Thank you. I am glad you like the photos. The set-up is very simple - length of roadway, Busch photographic backscene, and model. Nothing else, but lots of fun.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Ahh Husky - very much underrated series, which fell behind next to Matchbox. I have the ochre/orange version of this wagon, along with many other Husky toys. Ill have to dig out the Husky catalogues I have. The Busch background is so cool - ive never seen one of those before! Bill

    ReplyDelete