Saturday 16 November 2013

Einstein a Go-Go

Ok, bear with the ignorant Earthling, but i've just watched the Science of Dr Who with Brian Cox. Very entertaining, but im not an astrophysicist, so one or two concepts escaped me. Following on from Woodsys diagram of the one shown on the show, which illustrated the passage of spacetime, Prof Cox showed a 'future light cone' and a 'past light cone' emanating from any given point in time, namely our present moment.

According to Einsteins Special Theory of Relativity, time travel is impossible, due to the inability to exceed the speed of light. Light travels in straight lines, at a fixed rate, but does it travel backwards in time ? My understanding of the theory is shown above, i'm sat at the centre, being me. My future extends before me and my past (naturally) sits behind my current timeline. Apparently, the light cone extends at 45 degrees to my present time plane, both into the future and back to the past. My understanding of light is that it proceeds in all directions, so should logically be a sphere, as shown on Wotans Special Theory, above.

If however, light (or spatial events) radiate outward, as Cox suggested with Faradays candle, infinitely, then light from a cone in the past, should therefore impinge on events in that points future (my present) as shown below.
So if light cones, or in my concept, spheres, extend forward and backward instantaneously, surely, time travel is occuring, contrary to Einsteins theory? If a past event does radiate forward, does it in any fashion effect the future event ? Apart from the actual causal chain of real events ?

or am I missing the point here......?

13 comments:

  1. I think what he's saying is that anything that happens in the past can only get to the future at the speed of light at most. setting his graph out of space and time axes at right angles, the sloping line would be at a gradient that was the speed of light, since that's the limit, things go on inside that sloping line but they can't go on beyond it. this means We're trapped in some bits of spacetime, so we can't get out of our future cone, to swing round to the one behind us. its not just about light, its any cause and effect, I think?

    ReplyDelete
  2. i see, i couldnt get my head around how the cone comes about, why doesnt light etc travel horizontally from the observer? or is that what the bit with Jim Alkaseltzer on the trolley was about ?

    ReplyDelete
  3. That graph wasn't 2D space, it was a graph showing space and time axes, the lines aren't light rays, they are a series of points in spacetime that bound what can happen because of light speed being the limit.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Aha. Now I get it. Must pay attention in class!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Wibbly, wobbly, Timey, wimey stuff. We'll probably find out its wrong anyway, in the future (or the past).

    ReplyDelete
  6. Kev - never mind idolising Kirk, youd make a great Dr!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Somewhat worryingly, that's what my ex pupils used to say!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Get yourself a cravat and some frilly collared shirts,!

    ReplyDelete
  9. I've already got the robot dog.

    ReplyDelete
  10. It all sounds like a load of hypertheortical rubbish to me , and the perfect time for a doze!

    ReplyDelete
  11. Light is bent by gravity. So it's not straight at all!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Actually, its the space that light is travelling through that gets bent by gravity, the light is trying to go straight.

      Delete
  12. Now were drifting inadvertantly into pythonesque comedy!

    ReplyDelete